|
4 Points =
Team members are cooperative and share equally in performing the
task. All mathematical measurements, equations, and computation correspond to the description and
drawing. The fountain is realistically possible. The drawing is accurately and neatly drawn on
coordinate paper. The written description is clear and complete, and it displays a high level
understanding of the concepts involved in the task.
3 Points = Team members are cooperative, but do not
share equally in performing the task. The group needs some assistance from
the teacher while performing the task. Not all the mathematical
measurements, equations, and computations correspond to the description and
drawing. The fountain is, however, realistically possible. The drawing is
either inaccurate or not neat. The written description lacks clarity and
displays only a partial understanding of the concepts involved in the task.
2 Points = Although the team members are
cooperative, either one or two students dominate the activity or one or two
contribute very little. Even with much assistance from the teacher, the
team has difficulty completing the task. Several errors occur in their
work. Students are hazy about what they have to do and how to go about doing it. They do not demonstrate sufficient
mathematical knowledge needed to do the task. Hence, the design is not realistic. The written
description is neither clear nor complete and displays little understanding of the concepts involved in
the task.
1 Point = The students are uncooperative and do not work as a team.
They show very little understanding of the mathematics necessary to do the
task. There are many errors in their work, and they are unable to arrive at
a reasonable product. Written description, if attempted, displays no
understanding of the concepts involved in the task.
|
