|
4 Points =
The student is able to complete the experiment without coaching.
He/she shows understanding of experimental design and is able to carry out
an experiment. He/she can make valid conclusions to the experiment. The
student can identify the best consumer product from the inquiry and can
make a connection between this and consumer purchasing. The entry in the
student's journal is complete, and valid conclusions are stated.
3 Points = The student is able to complete the
experiment with minimal coaching. He/she seems to understand consumer
products and purchasing, but the connections to his/her experiment are not
convincing. The student addresses all items in his/her journal but has difficulty
communicating conclusions.
2 Points = The student needs much coaching to
complete the experiment. He/she is unable to draw conclusions from the
experiment and has gained only partial understanding of the inquiry process
and of experimental design. The student is unable to link the inquiry to an
understanding of consumer products and purchasing. The entry in the
student's journal is incomplete. Conclusions are minimal and are vaguely
stated.
1 Point = Even with extensive coaching, the student does not complete
the task. He/she shows no understanding of experimental design or of the inquiry process. The student does not
conduct a viable experiment; therefore, no valid conclusions nor connections to consumer purchasing are
made. His/her journal is meaningless, and no conclusions are stated.
|
