|

|

|
Gold Seal Lesson:
Junk Mail
|
|

|
|
Copernicus
Education Gateway
|
|

|
|
Subject:
|

|
|
Mathematics
|
|
Grade:
|
|
|
5-8
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
ICLE Standards:
|
|
|
The student uses simple logical reasoning to
develop conclusions and is able to express that conclusion in both graphs
and in writing.
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Performance Task:
|
|
|
Students each keep a record of their family's mail
for two weeks. They record the total number of pieces received each day, as
well as the number that are considered junk mail. They must develop a
definition of what junk mail is, and why different people have somewhat
different definitions of what it is. They may further categorize their
mail, perhaps separating out good junk mail from bad, bills from letters,
and so forth. Whether a child disaggregates his/her family's mail beyond
junk versus non-junk should be left up to the child and should not be a
part of the student's grade. The class should engage in several brief
discussions during the two weeks, focusing on a definition of junk mail and
what regulations govern the sending of such mail. They should also explore
various types of graphs, their similarities and differences and how data
can be represented in graph form. At the end of two weeks of data
collection, the students should decide what data they want to present and
how best to graph it. They also decide what they think about junk mail and
write a letter to someone appropriate (a newspaper editor, a legislator
reviewing legislation regarding junk mail, someone that sends a lot of junk
mail).
Note to the teacher.- Students may have very different conclusions about
the value of junk mail. This task is not to teach youngsters that such mail
is good or bad, but to teach them to use data and to develop thoughtful
responses. Teachers need to ensure that differing opinions are respected,
and that sound reasoning, not the final conclusion, is what is evaluated.
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Knowledge / Skills:
|
|
|
Apply in writing the rules and conventions of
grammar, usage, punctuation, paragraphing and spelling. (ela1)
Understand the nature and purpose of a variety
of technical formats such as business letters, memos, instructions, policy
statements, technical proposals, user manuals, lab reports, etc. (ela30)
Apply the zero property of multiplication to
find the solution of quadratic equations.
(ela53)
Understand the best procedures for statistical
data collection, organization, and display. (m5)
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Rubric:
|
|
|
Ready
4 Points = You carefully looked through your mail for a few days, talked with several people about junk mail, and then developed your own specific and unique categories for classifying your mail,
3 Points = You looked through a sample of your mail, talked with a few people about junk mail, and then developed a few logical categories for classifying your mail. (The difference between a "3" and a "4" is the amount of thought and the usefulness of categories developed.)
2 Points = You looked through some mail and/or talked with someone about junk mail before deciding what your categories would be. Your categories work most of the time, but some mail may fit snore than one category.
1 Point = You did decide on categories before beginning to collect data, but there is little evidence that you thought much about how to get them just right. When you begin sorting your mail, you find overlapping categories and/or mail that doesn't fit any one category.
Get Set
4 Points = You have complete, accurate records of mail received each day, using your categories as a guide. In addition, you have notes detailing any trends or observations that might be of interest later, when writing your letter.
3 Points = You have a complete, accurate record of mail received each day, using your categories as a guide.
2 Points = You have complete, accurate records of mail received each day. You may have difficulty deciding how to categorize some mail.
I Point = You have records of all or nearly all mail received. You may have had difficulty deciding how to categorize some mail.
Go - Graph
4 Points = Your graph accurately depicts your data and is clear, easy to read, thoughtfully organized, and neat.
3 Points = Your graph accurately depicts your data and is clear, easy to read, and neat.
2 Points = Your graph accurately depicts your data. It may need work to make it easier to read or to make it neat and legible.
I Point = You may have minor errors in accurately recording your data. Your graph also may need work to make it easier to read or to make it neat and legible.
Go - Letter
4 Points = Your letter accurately describes your findings about junk mail. It also presents important concerns that you have about junk mail arising from your study and persuasively offers suggestions and/or conclusions. Of course, it has been carefully edited so there are no grammatical or mechanical errors.
3 Points = Your letter accurately describes your findings about junk mail. It also presents concerns about junk mail, but the links between your study and your concerns may not be easily seen. You do offer a suggestion or conclusion, and you have carefully edited your letter so there are few, if any, errors.
2 Points = Your letter describes your findings about junk mail and offers some suggestions, but both your descriptions and suggestions are general, not specific. You need more detail. You did edit your letter, and there are fewer than five minor errors in grammar or mechanics.
1 Point = Your letter is very general and not organized in a logical way, so it is difficult to follow your reasoning. You definitely need to reorganize what you are saying and add specific detail. Also, your editing has let five or more minor grammatical or mechanical errors slide by.
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Keywords:
|
|
|
READING
CONSTRUCT MEANING
DATA COLLECTION
DATA ANALYSIS
DATA DISPLAY
GRAPHS WRITING
CORRESPONDENCE
GRAMMAR
MECHANICS
SPELLING
PERSUASION
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Grades:
|
|
|
Kg [] - 1 [] - 2 [] - 3 [] - 4 [] - 5 [x] - 6 [x] - 7 [x] - 8 [x] - 9 [] - 10 [] - 11 [] - 12 []
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
ICLE Application:
|
|
|
D
|
|
|
|

|

|
|
|
|
|
© 2000 International
Center for Leadership in Education
1587 Route 146 - Rexford - NY - 12148
518.399.2776 Fax: 518.399.7607
117
|
|
|
|
|

|
|