|
4 Points =
The student contributed to the group effort by asking 25 adult and
adolescent males their shoe size. He or she could organize the group's data
in a table and the class data into a table. The student could transpose the
class data into a computer spreadsheet and accurately bar graph the data.
He/she could compare the curve of the graph to a normal distribution curve
and note the resemblance. The student analyzed the graph and could conclude
the number of each shoe size to order for the department store to sell.
3 Points = The student contributed to the group
effort by collecting the shoe size from at least 20 adult and adolescent
males. He or she could organize the group's data in a table and the class
data in a table with some help from the teacher and/or peers. The student
could transpose the data into a computer spreadsheet but needed help in
preparing the bar graph. He or she could see the resemblance between
his/her graph to a normal distribution curve. The student, with some
coaching, analyzed the graph and could conclude the number of each shoe size
to order for the department store to sell.
2 Points = The student did not fully contribute to
the group effort as demonstrated by not surveying more than 10 individuals.
He or she relied on others to organize the data into tables. He/she could
transpose the data to a computer spreadsheet but required considerable
extra help in preparing a bar graph. The student could not see the
resemblance between the bar graph and a normal distribution curve. He or
she was not able to accurately determine the number of shoes to order for
the department store to sell.
1 Point = The student did not complete the project and demonstrated
very little understanding of this process.
|
