|
4 Points =
The student makes a complete response to all parts of the task. The
height function derived is correct. The supporting data and explanation of
the derivation of the function are clear and concise. The dimensions of the package are appropriate for the derived function and
the physical design of the cone. He/she shows a thorough understanding of the mathematical ideas
and processes contained in the problem.
3 Points = The student needs some coaching to make
a complete response to all parts of the task. The height function is
correct but the supporting data and explanation of its derivation show some
lack of understanding of the mathematical principles. The dimensions of the package
are not realistic for the derived function and physical design of the cone.
2 Points = The student makes only partial response
to all parts of the task. The height function is incorrect. The supporting
data and explanation fail to show an understanding of mathematical
principles. The dimensions of the package are given, but are not close to
being reasonable.
1 Point = The student does not complete the task. The height function
is incorrect or is not give at all. Supportive data are missing or
inaccurate. There are no dimensions for the package given. The student
shows little or no understanding of the problem.
|