|

|

|
Gold Seal Lesson:
I'M Thirsty
|
|

|
|
Copernicus
Education Gateway
|
|

|
|
Subject:
|

|
|
Science
|
|
Grade:
|
|
|
9-12
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
ICLE Standards:
|
|
|
Science as Inquiry: Develop the abilities of
scientific inquiry.
Science in Personal and Social Perspectives:
Develop an understanding of personal and community health.
Problem Solving: Apply integrated
problem-solving strategies to solve real-world problems.
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Performance Task:
|
|
|
Working in a team with two classmates, you are to
design a way to purify water necessitated by the fictitious disaster given in the scenario below.
Scenario: A major earthquake occurred yesterday in Northern California. A
large dam in the area was nearly destroyed, resulting in severe flooding. People are
without water, gas, and
electricity. Although surrounded by water, people have no clean water to
drink. The area of the quake has been declared a natural disaster area. People can only
survive about 3 days
without water, and it is not known when drinkable water will be available.
Design a method to purify some of the water surrounding area homes. You
only have the following materials available: heat source, funnel, coffee filter, sand/gravel, charcoal
briquettes, glass and plastic containers, and sieve. Your teacher will provide a sample of "foul" water. To
test for portability, you may send a sample to a local laboratory.
After completing the task, write a team laboratory report which
communicates your team's thinking process. Include the procedure your team used to produce water that is potable for
human consumption. Your conclusion should discuss which purification processes worked well and which did not.
If your purification process was not working well, state any modifications your team made.
Write a short paragraph or two, describing how families could prepare for
natural disasters like this that might occur.
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Knowledge / Skills:
|
|
|
Plan and apply real or hypothetical models and
constructions to facilitate investigation and learning and the solution to
practical problems. (s115)
Identify and comprehend the concepts involving
the earth's water, i.e., ground water (infiltration, permeability,
porosity, and capillarity), surface water (runoff), and pollution (sources,
types, concentration, and long range effects). (s17)
Understand the human impact on the environment
through pollution (air, water, and soil), and ways to improve it through
education, research, laws, and conservation. (s10)
Participate, sometimes leading, in group meetings
by contributing, taking turns speaking, and working toward a common
goal. (ela20)
Use writing as a tool for learning in formats
such as learning logs, laboratory reports, note-taking, and journals. (ela40)
Use expository writing skills in subjects other
than English language arts. (ela58)
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Rubric:
|
|
|
4 Points =
The student made significant contributions to the team, enabling the
team to design, test, and evaluate its water purification processes. The
water purification processes included a means to kill microbes, eliminate
microscopic chemical impurities, and filter macroscopic particles from the
water. The portability testing procedure was practical and would
satisfactorily conclude whether the water was safe for human consumption.
The group made several appropriate suggestions to prepare families for
natural disasters. The written lab report is complete, mechanically
correct, and in the appropriate scientific method lab report format.
3 Points = The student made valuable contributions
to the team, enabling the team to design, test, and evaluate its water
purification processes. The water purification processes were thorough, but
did not provide a means to remove some of the microscopic and macroscopic
contaminants from the water. The portability testing procedure is practical
and may or may not satisfactorily conclude whether the water was safe for
human consumption. The group made several appropriate suggestions to
prepare families for natural disasters. The written lab report is complete,
mechanically correct, and in the appropriate scientific method lab report
format.
2 Points = The student made few contributions to
the group. The group experienced difficulty in either designing, testing,
or evaluating its water purification processes. The water purification
processes produced undrinkable water that still contained unacceptable
amounts of contaminants. The portability test is not practical and may or
may not satisfactorily conclude whether the water is safe for consumption.
The group made at least one suggestion to prepare families for a natural
disaster. The written lab report is fairly complete, but contains
mechanical errors, and is not organized in the appropriate scientific
method lab report format.
1 Point = The student made no valuable contributions to the group. The
group experienced difficulty in designing, testing, and evaluating its
water purification processes. The water purification processes produced
undrinkable water that still contained unacceptable amounts of
contaminants. The portability test is not practical and does not
satisfactorily conclude whether the water is safe for consumption. The
group did not make any worthwhile suggestions to prepare families for a
natural disaster. The written lab report is only partially complete, and
contains many mechanical errors. The scientific method lab report format
was not followed.
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Keywords:
|
|
|
LIFE SCIENCE
ECOLOGY
MICROORGANISMS
EARTH
SCIENCE
WATER
MODELS AND CONSTRUCTION
POLLUTION
EXPOSITION
TEAM WORK
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Grades:
|
|
|
Kg [] - 1 [] - 2 [] - 3 [] - 4 [] - 5 [] - 6 [] - 7 [] - 8 [] - 9 [X]
- 10 [X] - 11 [X] - 12 [X]
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
ICLE Application:
|
|
|
D
|
|
|
|

|

|
|
|
|
|
© 2000 International
Center for Leadership in Education
1587 Route 146 - Rexford - NY - 12148
518.399.2776 Fax: 518.399.7607
101
|
|
|
|
|

|
|