|
4
POINTS: The student independently
completes the task and demonstrates that he/she knows how both a city and a
cell function. The student can see similarities in functions between parts
of the city and parts of the cell. He/she can predict what will happen to
the city and the cell if some of the parts become nonfunctional. The
student's written descriptions are clear and demonstrate good English
usage.
3 POINTS: The student needs some
assistance to complete the task. The student demonstrates that he/she knows
how both a city and a cell function. He/she has some difficulty in seeing
the similarities in functions between parts of the city and parts of the
cell. The student has difficulty predicting what will happen if some of the
parts become nonfunctional. The student's written descriptions are not
totally clear and contain some grammatical errors.
2 POINTS: The student needs
constant assistance to complete the task. He/she demonstrates only partial
understanding of how cities and cells function. The student has difficulty
seeing how parts of the city function in a similar manner to parts of the
cell. He/she does not clearly predict what will happen if some of the parts
of the city and cell become nonfunctional. The student's written
descriptions are vague and contain many grammatical errors.
1 POINT: The student does not
complete the task. He/she shows little understanding of how a city and a
cell function. The student makes no comparison of parts of the city with
parts of the cell. He/she makes no viable prediction of what will happen if
parts of the city and cell become nonfunctional. The student's written
descriptions, if any, are meaningless and state nothing of value.
|
