|
4 Points =
Students work cooperatively as a team with all team members sharing
equally in performing the task. They include in their report the attributes
that would determine why they chose the power source they did and the key
components that led them to make their decision. The report is written in a
clear, concise manner and uses good English structure.
3 Points = Students work cooperatively as a team,
but not all members share equally in performing the task. They need some
coaching in describing the attributes needed to determine why their power
source is the best choice. The key components that led them to make their
decision are not succinctly stated. The written report is fairly clear and
concise, but does not read smoothly. It demonstrates weak written
communication skills.
2 Points = Students have difficulty working as a
team. Although they are not uncooperative, they tend to work as
individuals. The students are very vague about why they chose their power
source and give a poor description of the components needed for their
energy source. The written report is unclear and not convincing. It is
poorly constructed and shows little, if any, written communication skills.
1 Point = The students do not cooperate on the task and at times are
uncooperative with each other. They demonstrate little team work skills.
They show no understanding of an alternative power source and how it could be used. Their written report is poorly constructed and
meaningless.
|
